Skip to main content


By May 12, 2016August 15th, 2023No Comments

In this Age of Information, the issue of cyber stalking has become more prevalent. Our generation often makes remarks about “Facebook stalking” potential boyfriends and girlfriends, future roommates, classmates, etc. to be better acquainted with them. This practice is considered common and legal online behavior.

What is cyberstalking?

Cyberstalking is different from Facebook stalking. It is the use of online technology to harass, intimidate, or cause severe emotional distress to another person. It includes a wide range of, usually malicious, online behaviors such as, sending threatening tweets, excessive emailing, “revenge porn”, and even identity theft (for instance, logging into another’s Facebook page and feigning to be that person).

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1 in 4 adult victims of stalking also reported cyber stalking, usually through email (83% of cases) and/or instant messaging (35% of cases); this amounts to over 900,000 cases of cyber harassment in 2006 alone.

Though men and women are involved in cyber stalking at almost equal rates, women are more likely to be its victims. Between 2000 and 2011, women were the victims in over 70% of cyber stalking cases brought to Working to Halt Abuse, a volunteer organization that strives to educate the general public on online harassment. Often the perpetrator of cyber stalking is an ex boyfriend or girlfriend, or perhaps a classmate, but it is also possible, and quite common, that online harassment is perpetrated by complete strangers.

Cyber stalking is a unique crime due to the anonymity enjoyed by those who commit it. To Internet users, the computer acts as a mask obscuring each person’s real identity and allows us to develop online personas.

Another important factor that distinguishes cyber crimes from other crimes is that they could be committed from one side of the world on a victim on the other side.

The Internet’s anonymity paired with the ability that it provides users to remain distant from others has allowed certain individuals to intimidate, bully, and threaten their victims from thousands of miles away from the comfort of their living room couch without ever having to see the consequences of their actions. Such a crime is now easier than ever to commit and the law is fighting a losing battle against new technology.

For instance, in Oklahoma there is no statute explicitly forbidding cyber stalking while online harassment could be charged as unlawful “unconsented contact.” Conversely, Washington D.C.’s laws specifically address the issue of online harassment in detail.

How do colleges handle cyberstalking?

Today, colleges have started taking steps to tackle this issue on their own. They are now defining the act in specific terms and forbidding the act of cyber stalking in their student conduct codes.

They are also providing informative seminars at freshman orientation on identifying online abuse and the process of reporting its cases. The remedy in cases of stalking on campus usually involves a no-contact order, which prohibits both parties from communicating with one another, either directly or indirectly, in person, through the Internet, over the phone, through notes, friends, or any other means.

Violation of a no-contact order can result in suspension for either or both parties. If the case has particularly grave implications, for instance if the perpetrator has threatened violence, then schools may take more serious measures. The George Washington University helps these victims navigate the D.C. court system to get a temporary restraining order or take more serious measures, if necessary.

How to handle cyberstalking?

If you think that you are a victim of cyber stalking, communicate to the other person in clear terms that you no longer wish to continue interacting with them. After this, do not reply to any kind of attempt of the person to communicate with you. If they continue to try and contact you through messages or any other platform, you should consider bringing the case to your college authorities or the police.


If you approach the court or the student disciplinary office with your case, you will need to make those messages available. Some ISPs completely erase deleted emails after 30 days, rendering them gone forever, so it is important to keep records of these interactions.

Technology has dramatically changed our world and how we interact with each other. Never before have we been able to communicate so instantaneously with anyone in the world, but new technology brings new threats that demand new legal approaches be developed.

These materials have been prepared by Cohen Seglias for informational purposes only and are not intended and should not be construed as legal advice.

Shan Wu

Author Shan Wu

Shan’s professional and personal background gives him a unique understanding of academic institutions and the criminal justice system. A former federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C., he is at home in D.C. Courts and very familiar with all of the Washington, D.C. law enforcement agencies, especially the Metropolitan Police Department. His parents were university professors so he grew up in a university environment. He understands the mindset of academic institutions. As a prosecutor, he supervised in the misdemeanor crime section. This is the section of the Washington, D.C. prosecutor’s office that handles most college student cases. His understanding of charging decisions and how judges view these cases is invaluable to his student clients and their families. Shan served as a federal prosecutor in the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia for over ten years. During his tenure there, now Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. appointed him to supervisory positions in the Misdemeanor Trial Section and also in a police corruption task force. His outstanding legal work in the government was recognized through numerous Special Achievement Awards from the Justice Department as well as awards conveyed by law enforcement agencies and community groups. From 1999-2000, Shan served as Counsel to Attorney General Janet Reno, advising her on criminal and civil investigations, E-Gov, E-Commerce (electronic signatures, internet gambling, internet telephony, privacy & public access issues in electronic court filings), congressional oversight, and legislative review. His responsibilities included serving as liaison to the FBI, DEA, Criminal Division, Executive Office of United States Attorneys, National Institute of Justice, and White House Counsel’s Office. Shan serves on the D.C. Bar Association’s Hearing Committee of the Board on Professional Responsibility and is a past president of the Asian Pacific American Bar Association for the Greater Washington, D.C. area. He is a 1988 graduate of Georgetown University Law Center, where he graduated Order of the Barristers, edited two law reviews, and was Co-Director of the Moot Court Program. He holds a B.A. in English Literature from Vassar College as well as a Master’s Degree in Creative Writing from Sarah Lawrence College. Following law school, he clerked for the late Hon. Jerry Buchmeyer, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the late Eugene Wright, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He is admitted to practice law in the District of Columbia and Connecticut.

More posts by Shan Wu
Skip to content